facebook twitter you tube



Devin's Deal or Tunnel Deal?

Can the ag community afford their share of building it, their share of the debt service and try to make a living for the 10 or 20 years it's going to take before they get any water out of it?

Mar 08, 2012


Families Protecting The Valley Newsletter

MARCH 8 2012


» Drought
» BondPoll
Donate to Families Protected the Valley
Visit Our Web Site

Visit Our Web Site

Board of Directors

Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
John "Dusty" Giacone
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls

Devin's Deal or Tunnel Deal?

The way we see the California water war, there's either got to be approval of Devin Nunes' H.R. 1837 or a giant tunnel is going to be built under the Delta. The entire Bay Delta Conservation Plan is heading toward the idea of a tunnel. That might be a good solution to the environmental situation in the Delta and providing more water to farms and people. But, how long will a tunnel take to build? How many farms can hold out for the decade or two for it to be built? How many 20% or 30% or 40% allocation years can they sustain?

The other problem with the tunnel is the environmentalists themselves. Will they ever let it be built? If they won't allow dams, why would they commit to a 35-mile tunnel under the Delta that deprives the Delta of the very water they say it needs to survive? Does anyone really believe it won't be tied up in court for years or even decades?

We know this: environmentalists don't have a problem with time or talking or delays. It all works for them. They like being in court. They get paid for it. We don't. For us, time is money. They can afford to outlast us because outlasting us is how they make their living.

We might also mention that the tunnel will cost at least $14-billion and we've already seen estimates as high as $23-billion. The debt service guestimate alone on it will be a billion a year out of the already bankrupt California budget. On top of all that, it's supposed to be a 'users pay' project. Can the ag community afford their share of building it, their share of the debt service and try to make a living for the 10 or 20 years it's going to take before they get any water out of it?

So, we would recommend everyone take a good, hard look at Devin's(and Denham's and McClintock's) H.R. 1837. It solves the problem now and saves money instead of spending. If people still want to move toward a tunnel or peripheral canal, they can move as fast or slow as they want because we'll have water while they do it. The water will be in our court while the lawsuits and delays go on and on. Time will then be on our side.

We would also offer this advice for people in and around the Delta and all environmentalists everywhere: if you believe the tunnel is inevetible, you might be better off with H.R. 1837. For environmentalists, it's got to be the lesser of what they would consider to be two evils. And remember this: if the people of Southern California ever realize where their water comes from (and they don't), and vote accordingly, they will get water one way or another.

Ending California's man-made drought

Kevin McCarthy, Devin Nunes,Jeff Denham

The man-made drought in California is no secret. Burdensome environmental regulations restricting water pumping in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta have contributed to hundreds of thousands of acres of fertile farmland going fallow in recent years.

During California's 2007-2009 drought, the Democratic majority and the Obama administration stood on the sidelines while farmers were forced to forgo planting, joblessness rose and families stood in food lines. It was a huge relief last year when we had abundant rain and snow, but instead of using 100 percent of that water for farming and storage, millions of acre-feet of water were allowed to be lost into the ocean.

This year is looking to be as dry as they come, and without adequate storage, we will continue to see the problem of water shortages year after year. We must act now to ensure that our communities get every of water possible to grow the crops that feed America and create the jobs that support families and local economies.

The U.S. House of Representatives did just that on Feb. 29 by passing the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act. If enacted, this bill will get water flowing in California and increase water storage for future years. Right now, water traveling through the delta has been reduced from a gush to a trickle because environmentalists care more about protecting fish than putting Californians back to work. Protecting ecosystems is important, but so are the crops that help feed America and produce jobs that promote economic recovery in our state. This bill takes the zealotry out of these environmental restrictions and puts California's water delivery system on more balanced and reliable footing.

In this bill, we return pumping operations to the bipartisan 1994 Bay Delta Accord. As many probably remember, this accord was hailed as an end to California's water wars and was roundly praised. The Clinton administration and other prominent Democrats such as Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, and Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt lent their support, as did Republican Gov. Pete Wilson, environmentalists and water users in both the Northern and Southern parts of the state. This was a good deal for everyone - and that's why we used it for the base of our bill.

By returning water pumping to the previously agreed-upon levels in the 1994 accord, Central Valley families and farmers will see an estimated increase of 1.4 million acre-feet of water. That's enough to irrigate 460,000 acres of farmland or provide drinking water to more than 1 million households for one year. It's also enough to create up to 30,000 agricultural jobs in the valley, according to economic impact studies. All told, this is legislation that will put people back to work, ensure a more reliable water supply to California farmers, and generate revenue for the federal government. Unlike the Obama administration's failed economic stimulus, this bill will create jobs at no cost to the taxpayer. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will bring in an estimated $221 million by allowing water contractors to prepay for their water.

The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act is smart legislation that will have positive impacts not just for California families, farmers and small businesses, but for all of America as well. We can no longer allow a fish to be prioritized above our families and food supply. We have to get our priorities right. This bill does that, and we look forward to the Senate taking it up and joining us in putting an end to California's man-made water crisis.

Reps. Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield; Devin Nunes, R-Tulare; and Jeff Denham, R-Merced, represent the Central Valley in the U.S. House of Representatives.


Commentary: Brash SJV Congressman Shifts California Water Wars

Commentary: Cost/Benefit Analysis Needed for Tunnel

Conveyance Tunnel Debt Service $1.1B Annually

California Delta Would Build Tunnels to Pump Water

Commentary: You Will Have No Real Say As A Voter in Peripheral Canal 2.0

Delta Tunnel Plan Would Increase Pumping

If you enjoy our newsletter please send it to friends. If you're a member of an organization please feel free to send it to everyone on your list. If someone sent this to you and you'd like your own free subscription, sign up here. If you'd like to respond just click 'reply' or send to john@familiesprotectingthevalley.com



Valid RSS FeedGet the 10 most recent items from our RSS feed.