559-286-7795
facebook twitter you tube
 

Newsletter

 

Dianne Feinstein's Bill (Con'd)

"The outcome of a conference committee concerns me." - Congressman John Garamendi

May 15, 2014

"The outcome of a conference committee concerns me." - Congressman John Garamendi

When Republicans in Cogresss passed David Valadao's Emergency Water Act (the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Emergency Water Delivery Act, HR3964), it put pressure on Dianne Feinstein to pass something in the U.S. Senate. She introduced the California Emergency Drought Relief Act of 2014, co-sponsored with Barbara Boxer. That was in February, 3 months ago.

Last time we looked, she was blaming Republicans for the lack of action on the bill (Feinstein pleads for GOP votes on California drought bill). That was on April 10th, a month ago.

Now, the Senator is again looking for Democrats to support it (Senator Feinstein fishing for Democratic Support on Drought Bill). We hate to be the ones to keep reminding you of how the game is played, but doesn't this look a little familiar? Dianne promises action and nothing happens. She's managed to introduce a bill that neither Democrats or Republicans can support.

We are told by those supposedly 'in the know' that we should support the passage of the senate bill, even though there's nothing substantial in it because it will then go to conference committee for a compromise.

And again, as he has before, Congressman John Garamendi lets the cat out of the bag about the problem of passing the senate bill when he says "the outcome of a conference committee concerns me." He says if the Senate passes Feinstein’s bill, it would be reconciled with the GOP-led House version that “eviscerated environmental laws and the state constitution.”

In essense, he's saying that they don't want to pass it because they don't want to compromise. We are now playing the blame game. Who's fault is it that the senate bill isn't passing? I guess they would like you to believe it's the Republican's fault in the Democrat-controlled senate.



Senator Feinstein fishing for Democratic support on drought bill

Kitty Felde/SoCal Public Radio


Senator Dianne Feinstein floated the latest version of her water bill past some of its biggest skeptics: fellow Democrats from California.


Feinstein hosted a closed door meeting Wednesday morning with more than a half-dozen House members from northern and central California. Feinstein described it as a “private meeting” and didn’t offer any details, except to say she thought her House colleagues were “happy with this.”


Feinstein introduced a drought relief bill back in February. The California Emergency Drought Relief Act of 2014, co-sponsored with Barbara Boxer, would make it easier for federal agencies to move water to where it’s most needed, but still adhering to the Endangered Species Act.


A deal with leadership will get the measure to the Senate floor without a hearing. But so far, no floor action has been scheduled – in part because of concerns from House Democrats who are concerned the bill will hurt farmers and fishermen in Northern California.


Emerging from the meeting, Congressman Mike Thompson of St. Helena said Feinstein made changes “that alleviate some of our concerns.” East Bay Congressman George Miller, who has tussled with Feinstein over water policy through the years, called the meeting “encouraging,” but added: “We’re not there on all the points yet.”


House Republicans – plus Fresno Democrat Jim Costa – passed their own drought relief measure in early February. The Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Emergency Water Delivery Act preempts environmental restoration and rewrites California water laws, something that helps Central Valley farmers.


Congressman Costa says he went into the meeting with Feinstein already knowing his colleagues' “default positions.” He complains that it’s “difficult” for his colleagues up north to “look at the big picture,” which is fixing the state’s “broken water system.”


Costa notes California’s water system was designed for 18-20 million people. He says these continuous dry periods – “you can call it drought, you can call it climate change” – are going to be the “new norm” unless we decide to move “beyond some of our parochial interests and look at it as a statewide effort.”


Democrats aren’t just concerned about the specifics in Feinstein’s bill; they're also worried about the legislative process that follows. John Garamendi of Walnut Creek says "the outcome of a conference committee concerns me." He says if the Senate passes Feinstein’s bill, it would be reconciled with the GOP-led House version that “eviscerated environmental laws and the state constitution.”


Costa says there’s always another option: do nothing. “We can continue to be fixated on our parochial interests and blame the other part of the state for our water woes,” he says, but doing nothing guarantees continued water crises — not only for farmers in the Central Valley and fishermen in the north, but also for thirsty consumers in Southern California.

Valid RSS FeedGet the 10 most recent items from our RSS feed.

helpdonate
helpdonate