Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!
In the current ad Cortopassi claims that "all water bonds are in fact deliberately disguised to hide both internal and external pork"
Aug 18, 2014
Dino Cortopassi describes himself as a 77-year-old lifelong California resident retired from a 55-year career, first in farming and then in food prosessing. He is running a series of full-page ads he calls "Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!" in the San Diego Union, the Sacramento Bee, the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury News, the Stockton Record, the Los Angeles Times and the Fresno Bee. The ads make the case that California's economic condition isn't the rosy scenario being painted by politicians in Sacramento. He's paying for the ads out of his personal savings.
In the current ad Cortopassi claims that "all water bonds are in fact deliberately disguised to hide both internal and external pork." To prove his point he disects Prop 84 from 2006 where he says it "funneled cash to non-water state agencies as well as to non-water uses. Because many state agencies spend more than the general fund revenues provide, their shortfalls are increasingly augmented by bond sale cash flow." The ad shows a number of charts to back up his claim.
His summary conclusion is that the 2006 water bond had about "40% of that CON JOB related to water; about 40% was a cash funnel to other state agencies; and about 20% was political payola to generate broader bond support."
With all the money we've dedicated to water through bonds in California since 2000 (about $18.7-billion), it's difficult to not take a look at what he's saying. What do we have for the money so far? What will we get out of the current bond? Inquiring minds want to know.
If you want to check out his current ad, check it out here.
Joe Little/Channel 10 San Diego
SAN DIEGO - A full-page newspaper advertisement in several of California's largest newspapers claims a new water bond is watered down with "pork."
Lifelong Californian and retired farmer Dean "Dino" Cortopassi wrote and paid for the ad, which appeared Thursday in the U-T San Diego newspaper with the headline "Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!"
Cortopassi wrote that a $5.4 billion water bond measure approved by voters in 2006 was chalk full of "pork" -- a political term for items attached to bills that having nothing to do with the bill.
Cortopassi argued the bond included $7 million for things like the Habitat Journey exhibit at San Diego's Natural History Museum, $7 million for a space science center in Sacramento and $5 million for the Randall Museum in San Francisco.
He said a total of $93 million alone was spent on projects far from any water issue, and Cortopassi argued a new water bond appearing on this November's ballot, backed by Gov. Jerry Brown and both sides of the political aisle, will be also stuffed full of pork.
"I think that's unfair; it's apples and oranges," said political consultant John Dadian, who has never shied away from ripping politicians.
"There was a lot of what he [Cortopassi] called pork in the old bill," Dadian added. "And so he's insinuating that will be what happened in the new bill and he did it without looking at the new bill that was passed just this week."
"It's a day late and about $4 billion short," said San Diego County Water Authority Assistant General Manager Dennis Cushman.
Cushman said the new $7.5 billion water bond would help California's water woes in the future.
"And San Diego is very well positioned to be able to compete very well for water recycling investments, for conservation investments, for seawater desalination," he added. "It's open, it's competitive, and it's just right for California."
Dadian agreed, saying politicians actually put aside politics to fight the drought.
"It was a big compromise and I think that's good," Dadian said.
10News called and emailed Cortopassi to see where he saw any pork in the new bond measure, but he never responded.
Get the 10 most recent items from our RSS feed.