facebook twitter you tube



Watching Hetch Hetchy

It's ironic that San Francisco has committed the biggest environmental rape of all, but to get water we all must make some environmental sacrifices

Feb 21, 2012


Families Protecting The Valley Newsletter

FEBRUARY 21 2012


» PeterGleick
» NunesBill
Donate to Families Protected the Valley
Visit Our Web Site

Visit Our Web Site

Board of Directors

Denis Prosperi
Chester Andrew
Bob Smittcamp
Russ Waymire
John "Dusty" Giacone
Joe Marchini
Mark Watte
Kole Upton
Piedad Ayala
Tom Barcellos
Jim Walls

Watching Hetch Hetchy

There's a certain amount of satisfaction watching the debate in San Francisco about draining the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. The idea is to restore the scenic Yosemite valley that now sits under San Francisco's municipal water supply. The enviros in the Bay Area who continue to lecture us about how they need our water to restore the Delta ecosystem now have to look into the mirror to see their own hypocrisy.

This debate kind of sums up the debate we all have about how to get water. There are trade-offs. It's ironic that San Francisco has committed the biggest environmental rape of all, but to get water we all must make some environmental sacrifices. To raise a dam might submerge some scenic river, but it's not as bad as covering Yosemite. To build a dam might change a river, but it's not as bad as covering Yosemite. We will all have to give up something to get more water, but we're just going to have to make the tough choices.

The fact of the matter is that we don't support any effort to tear down any water storage of any kind anywhere. We are for building more storage. We suspect the self-proclaimed environmentalists in Baghdad-by-the-Bay will have a lot more trouble deciding this issue than we would. Imagine so-called environmentalists who are always for the correct environmental decision as long as it doesn't impact them now having to vote against the environment to protect their own water supply. We could have mass schizoprenia break out at election time.

Whatever the outcome of this issue, it will be fun for the rest of us to watch.


Drawbacks too plentiful to drain Hetch Hetchy

SF Examiner Editorial

An environmental group is trying to place a measure on the November ballot in San Francisco that would begin the process of draining the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir. While the goal of restoring that scenic Yosemite valley to its pristine nature is admirable, its drawbacks outweigh its advantages for San Franciscans.

Hetch Hetchy supplies 220 million gallons of clean, unfiltered water from the Sierra Nevada snowmelt and precipitation each day to 2.5 million Bay Area residents, including San Franciscans. In a state that recently suffered several years of drought and is currently experiencing a dry winter, Hetch Hetchy stores up to 117 billion gallons of water.

The system also generates 1.6 billion kilowatt hours of clean, hydroelectric power annually for San Francisco. In another environmental bonus, the high elevation of the reservoir allows the water to move across the state using little more than gravity, ensuring that San Franciscans receive water and power from a greenhouse gas-free system.

Amazingly, it only costs San Francisco $30,000 per year to use Hetch-Hetchy as a reservoir, thanks to water rights going back to 1913. That’s an incredible bargain, something to be celebrated rather than thrown away. But it may have to be fought for because Republican Rep. Devin Nunes wants to increase it to $34 million per year, arguing that San Francisco’s cheap rent is an unfair federal subsidy.

Fortunately, The City has a powerful fighter in its corner, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who has been arguing for years against draining Hetch Hetchy. “There is simply no feasible way to replace the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir, return the valley to its original condition and still provide water to the Bay Area,” she recently wrote in an opinion piece.

Perhaps the biggest drawback to draining Hetch Hetchy and restoring the valley is that it could cost as much as $10 billion, according to a state study in 2006.

That money would have to come from the federal budget, which is more than $15 trillion in debt and adding more than a trillion dollars each year. Or it would have to come from California’s budget, which is facing a $13 billion shortfall. Or it would need to come from San Francisco’s budget that is looking at a $229 million deficit in the next fiscal year and a $364 million deficit in the year after.

But, assuming San Franciscans decide to go down this road (by the way, shouldn’t the 1.7 million other Bay Area residents receiving Hetch Hetchy water get a say?) and money is found, there is no guarantee that a drained Hetch Hetchy will look anything like the pristine valley championed by John Muir a century ago.

It might instead become a mosquito-infested, weed-filled eyesore for years, perhaps decades.

Ironically, as visitors to Hetch Hetchy know, it’s actually a lovely setting as it is. If the man-made reservoir were actually a natural lake, it would be lauded as one of the wonders of Yosemite instead of something in need of destruction.

If you enjoy our newsletter please send it to friends. If you're a member of an organization please feel free to send it to everyone on your list. If someone sent this to you and you'd like your own free subscription, sign up here. If you'd like to respond just click 'reply' or send to john@familiesprotectingthevalley.com


Valid RSS FeedGet the 10 most recent items from our RSS feed.